Getting the message out

Each month the work of getting the revisionist message out is a little different. This month we are focusing on sending the following text and links to some 27,000 students associated with student organizations at university campuses across the nation. These links lead to autobiographical stories that present the life of one Holocaust revisionist from a perspective the student will never find in his Holocaust Studies programs. I believe it will cause any number of students to reevaluate the standard professorial slander used to characterize the “character” of those of us who doubt what the student is taught to believe.

The cost for developing these lists, one email at a time, is about $10 per hundred. As of now that works out to about $2,700. I would like to build a list of 100,000 students associated with student organizations at campuses around the country. It costs money to get the message out. But that’s our work. If you can help it will make all the difference.

Below is the full text of the send that is going out now to student organizations nation-wide.

===========================

A PERSONAL HISTORY OF MORAL DECAY

By Bradley Smith

NOTE: Campus newspapers at universities around the country are refusing to publish advertisements for the stories linked to below. That is their right. But what is the problem, specifically? The stories take place from the 1950s in South-Central Los Angeles, Korea, and Mexico through the 60s and 70s in Hollywood and Vietnam. And from there on through Iran to today in Baja.

Campuses at which the student newspaper has refused to allow their readers access to these stories include UCLA, Harvard, U Wisconsin-Madison, UC San Diego, USC, UC Santa Barbara, U South Florida, UC Irvine, Cal State Fullerton, Youngstown State, San Diego State, U Miami, American U and Columbia. That is--it’s a nation-wide phenomenon.

Why do you think the campus press does not want its readers to even know that these stories exist? And why do faculty at these universities invariably (invariably!) support the ban against students being informed that these simple stories exist? Do you believe such bans carried out nation-wide respect the ideals of a free press or of the university itself?

Do you want to talk about it?

Reach me at bradley1930@yahoo.com

Or

Bradley Smith

CODOH

PO Box 439016

San Ysidro, CA 92143

==================================================


1950s (SOUTH CENTRAL LOS ANGELES ) "The Daring Young Man Meets William Saroyan"
http://codohfounder.com/the-daring-young-man-meets-william-saroyan


1950s (MEXICO) "Laughing at the Dead. Not laughing"
http://codohfounder.com/laughing-at-the-dead-not-laughing


1960s (HOLLYWOOD) "Saved By The Animals"
http://codohfounder.com/saved-by-the-animals


1960s (VIETNAM) "Che Guevara in Saigon"
http://codohfounder.com/che-guevara-in-saigon


1970s (HOLLYWOOD) "Libertarians, Aliens, and Mal-contents"
http://codohfounder.com/libertarians-aliens-and-mal-contents

END

Not Enough Revisionists in Jail - Or Executed

Jewish judges and lawyers gathered, as announced in Smith's Report, in Berlin last November and cooked up more new ways to use the law to control discussion of the Holocaust on the Internet in countries all over the world. They've come up with this resolution lamenting, among other things, the fact that so few revisionists have been convicted of crimes in the countries in which such activities are a crime (no doubt they mean to increase the number of such countries, as they applaud Germany's membership in that shameful group). Presumably, they also lament that those convicted are only incarcerated for a few years (e.g., Germar Rudolf, Ernst Zündel) instead of being locked up for life or, better yet, exterminated altogether.

The attendees have returned to their respective jurisdictions, and are no doubt diligently working to suppress the freedom of speech practiced on the Internet that has so discomfited them in so many ways.

Inter-National Historical Disputes, and Trade

Jean would like to buy a lot of refrigerators from Mehmet (who makes good refrigerators cheaply in Turkey) for his (Jean's) customers in France.

But he can't. Or if he can, he has to pay more for them than if . . . their respective countries' governments weren't feuding over a historical matter (the killing of Armenians by Turks a hundred years ago). The French government just passed a law making it a crime to say that "it" wasn't "genocide."

So the Turkish government (or the French, or both) interfere with Jean and Mehmet's conspiracy to provide better refrigerators to French consumers while providing gainful employment to Turkish workers.

So it goes.

Jewish Lightning - with Swastikas!

The arson of over-insured buildings - and cars - has somehow over the years acquired the prejudicial sobriquet "Jewish lightning," a reference apparently not so much to the arsonists as to the owners of the torched assets who stand to collect from the insurance company.

The burning last November of a Jaguar in a Jewish neighborhood of Brooklyn was heavily marked as a hate crime, not only from the beer bottles littering the area (haters like beer) but from the spray-painting of swastikas and "KKK" on nearby objects and, just to be thorough, the torching of the BMW and the Lexus parked next to the target vehicle. The ADL has offered a $4,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of the perpetrators of this arson, though their offer may have disappeared by the time you try to follow this link to it.

A report in a neighborhood Brooklyn newspaper now reveals that in this case, the arsonists themselves may be Jewish, though it leaves the ethnicity of the owners of the cars to inference from the heavy majority of those living and parking their cars in the area. Investigators have turned up evidence that the Jag was burned for the insurance money, with the BMW, the Lexus, and the overworked legacy of the Holocaust thrown in to make it look like anti-Semitism.

Do not expect major news outlets such as those that carried the original "hate crime" story to carry follow-up stories. Doing so might be seen as anti-Semitic.

Holocaust Controversies: It's Here!

For those who have read "our" indefatigable researchers Carlo Mattogno, Thomas Kues, and Jürgen Graf, the anti-revisionist Web site Holocaust Controversies have produced an imposing "Critique of the Falsehoods of Mattogno, Graf, and Kues."

I haven't read it (just received it - I HAVE read the aforementioned falsehoods themselves), but it looks quite like engagement - 571 pages of it! Even if it is itself a load of falsehoods, it is clearly a very large body of them, assembled with care and even skill by the Others who care about the things we care about.

There are today so few with the awareness involved in appreciating the importance of our issues that I feel we rather owe it to our adversaries to accord their efforts the (considerable) attention involved in evaluating their work - and cheer the spirit of engagement that their massive oeuvre bespeaks!