Saturday, June 30, 2012

Poland: Still Torturing after All These Years

As a country, Poland over the last few centuries has sort of faded in and out, like the light of a firefly. But when it flares into existence, it has distinguished itself at an activity engaged in by repressive (read: all) states everywhere: the detention and torture of political prisoners for information and useful confessions, often for other countries, such as the USSR since World War II.

But Poland outdid itself in 1945-1947, when it extracted from Rudolf Höss, former comandant of Auschwitz, a "confession" to having overseen the murder of 4.5 million or so Jews there. It rewarded Höss for his monumental fabrication by hanging him, even while the Holocaust edifice was being erected on the cornerstone of his writings.

Today, we note reports that the CIA has found in Poland a congenial host for its torturing enterprise, having established and operated a "black site" in that country, as well as, it is fair to note, a few others (Poland has no monopoly in this, unfortunately).

The "confessions" extracted from the CIA's unfortunate detainees there, we may dismiss as having been gained by means of torture.

Those of Höss, of course, are a different matter. Because he was a Nazi?

Saturday, May 26, 2012

For Vincent Reynouard


From Robert Faurrison

I sincerely hope that the recent appeal by Vincent Reynouard with, at his side, Marie Bruchet, will be heard by all our friends.

At the strictly scientific and historical level revisionism has won the match but, on the other hand, at the educational, propaganda and media level we are more and more besieged. To the general public we increasingly risk appearing as losers. The flood of falsely scientific publications by our opponents swells relentlessly; now more than ever it must be stemmed with responses of real scientific and technical character. In France the Florent Brayards, Edouard Hussons, Patrick Desbois and partners come out with stacks of the most hefty, hollow and dishonest books. They need to be answered. We would be fooling ourselves if we thought it would do to keep quiet in the face of them, or refer people to revisionist studies published in the past.

At a trial five years ago barrister Charrière-Bournazel, then head of the Paris bar association and representing the “anti-racist” organisation LICRA against me, had the court itself remark his surprise at my “energy”. “Where does he get all that energy?”, he cried, adding, with the delicacy for which he is known: “The biological solution doesn’t seem to be in view!”.

Today the biological solution has come closer. My lifestyle – like, for that matter, Vincent Reynouard’s and that of other revisionists – is, so to speak, ... overwork.

At 83 such a lifestyle becomes deadly. In the face of this fatal outlook I used to console myself, until just lately, in thinking that the job would be carried on in France by Vincent Reynouard, assisted by a vigorous young woman (as I was able to see at the recent conference in Tehran where, knowing her subject thoroughly, she was not intimidated in the least by the opposing side). But now I learn the dismal news: Vincent and Marie might be forced to jump the revisionist galley!

There can be no question of it. Vincent Reynouard is exceptionally gifted for scientific research and, above all, he has no equal in the skill of explaining things. He owes this rare talent to his qualities of the heart: he knows how to listen, to put himself in the position of others and, with forbearance, to bring those unable or unwilling to understand back onto the path of comprehension and intelligence. His dedication to the revisionist cause is total and he has already paid dearly for his heroism.

It would be absurd and disgraceful if, having a man of this calibre in our ranks, we let go of him just when the desperate offensive of an opponent at bay threatened to swamp us.

There is of course more than one dwelling in the revisionist house and I know that, in his turn, a man of singular energy is about to enter fully upon the scene to come to our aid, but I shall say what I think: “Vincent Reynouard is irreplaceable”. You were probably already aware, but it seemed to me, at this defining moment for the future of revisionism, that I ought to remind you, even if with “the remnants of a dwindling voice and an ardour that is fading”.

I beseech you: give him your help, unstintingly. Do so for him, for me, for the noble cause of historical revisionism. Thank you.

March 31, 2012

________________

Note: For information on subscriptions to Vincent Reynouard’s publication Sans Concession or on membership of the Cercle d’amis de la famille Reynouard, please contact vincentreynouard@gmx.fr or sansconcession@gmx.fr.

Mr Reynouard’s website, “Pour une Histoire Débarrassée des Nombreux Mensonges » (For a History rid of numerous lies), is at www.phdnm.org

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Yes, AGAIN! And HERE! And SOON, Perhaps!

The US Army hasn't conducted a concentration operation on US soil since 1942 (when it rounded up and incarcerated Japanese Americans), but the Army has recently put out a detailed manual for its operatives to follow when doing so again - on short notice, it would seem.

Just supposing the technique could have some validity when and as carried out by the US Army, why must the equivalent technique carried out by German forces in times of dire conflict (chiefly after the war with the Soviet Union started) be a crime against humanity? Because Jews were prominent among the explicitly targeted subjects of the action?

All I can say is, Army, whomever you round up in this process in the future, do not round up any Jews. If you do somehow round any up, immediately let them go with apologies and lavish reparations (to continue for as long as they live).

Or is that already in the manual?

The Science of Hoaxography

A professor at George Mason University is making waves with a "laboratory" course he has been teaching for a few years now in how historical mythology is created, with emphasis, of course, on present-day media and environments such as the Internet.

This article in The Atlantic describes the course and its import very well. But the account, as well as apparently the course itself, somehow avoids that Hoax of the Twentieth Century that Arthur Butz indelibly named with the title of his landmark 1976 book.

It's clear that, in order to retain his academic post and standing, Professor Kelly must continue to avoid the biggest elephant in his room assiduously. But at a minimum, those of his students who pay even passing attention to his lessons will be unable to miss seeing where they most need to be applied.

Thursday, May 10, 2012

Their Names, Faces - and Voices!

The International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists has put up 14 videos on their Web site to convey the talks given at their conference "Holocaust Denial and Freedom of Speech in the Internet Era" in Berlin last November. Most of the talks are aimed at suppressing both of the first-named items.

While only two of the talks are by native speakers of English, the others acquit themselves very well with English as their second language, aided by the excellent recording quality that befits an organization as well funded as the IAJLJ and the other organizations pursuing the same agenda.

You can listen, and watch, as they tell each other how to go about their nefarious conspiracy. The videos are all carried on YouTube, use of which they seek to deny to revisionists. You can enter comments there.

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Bad Link on Smith's Report 191 ( May issue)

The article “Sensation in France: Professor Faurisson Forces the CRIF (Jewish Lobby) into a Humiliating Retreat” contains several links, one of which does not lead to the intended Web page.

On Page 9, the link http://tinyurl.com/88j92yn was supposed to lead to CRIF’s public retraction of the falsehoods they had previously published about Robert Faurisson. Instead, it leads to CRIF’s home page.

 The corrected link, reading http://tinyurl.com/8ydk7nu , leads to the intended Web page.

 The page is, like the previous articles to which the retraction relates, in French only.

Monday, April 30, 2012

Holocaust Education: From the Mouths of Babes

The self-glorifying "history" that every government crams down the throats of the young people they all force to attend school mostly goes ignored by its targets. Exceptional students take the trouble, for various reasons, to learn the material, and of these, a few take it seriously, absorbing some form or other of its ideological import.

But now and then, some governments so grossly overpromote such outrageously poor stuff that a contingent of the targets, typically in the teenage years where some are beginning to ask intelligent questions about what they are being told, actually rebels against the program they are being subjected to.

Such would seem to have happened, notably, in Israel, concerning a portrayal of the so-styled Holocaust in a play put on near Tel Aviv recently. A vocal part of the audience of a tired propaganda piece called Ghetto actually cheered those evil Nazis as they thrashed the hapless Jews in the cast. It's described in this article from The Times of Israel.

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Endless Holocaust, Endless War

US President Obama in a speech he made recently at the US Holocaust Memorial and Museum outlined the way Holocaust legendry is used to drag the United States and prospectively the rest of the world into wars initiated by Israel on the strength of its US backing.

Thursday, April 19, 2012

Fraudulent Moralizing Is SO Profitable

The Institute for Historical Review recently distributed this link to a review of the fraud perpetrated by author Alex Haley in his famous Roots book and television series.

The difference between Haley and Holo-fraudster Elie Wiesel?

Haley never got a Nobel Prize.

And why not, considering?

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

THE LAST DAYS OF THE BIG LIE

This text, which addresses Stephen Spielberg’s award winning documentary The Last days, is being copied to students, faculty, and administration at Universities across USA

**************************

THE LAST DAYS OF THE BIG LIE

The historical event known as "Holocaust" is in great part supported by eye witness testimony, seldom specifically corroborated . These testimonies have been a fundamental argument used by uncritical, conventional historians to publicize the "unique" monstrosity of the Germans during WWII, which is the uncontested Master Narrative of the Holocaust.

The murder of Jews in gas chambers is supported by eyewitness testimonies of inmates who "survived" different German camps. But there are "eyewitnesses" to gas-chamber murders that are so unbelievable, in fact so stupid, that those who tell them cannot and should not be believed.

Example: a Jewish lady, Irene Zisblatt, who claims that for months on end she swallowed the family jewels to keep them hidden from German monsters, pooped them out the next day and swallowed them again -- for month after month after month. In Auschwitz! Once maybe, but day after day for months on end? Is this a story full of s---, or what? Yet this video plays a major role in Steven Spielberg’s Hollywood award-winning documentary The Last Days.

In an unprecedented production, Eric Hunt has compiled some of the more brainless of these survivor testimonies, originally filmed by Hollywood hero Steven Spielberg. No Holocaust historian is making a fuss about this or any other episode of The Last Days. The US Holocaust Memorial Museum, dedicated to propagandizing "Holocaust", makes no public statement about the Zisblatt episode in Spielberg’s corrupt documentary. Why not?

Ms. Zisblatt, famous Holocaust eyewitness to a uniquely German monstrosity, is not alone in her lying about Germans and about herself. View the entire documentary by Eric Hunt -- The Last Days of the Big Lie:

http://youtu.be/80GgRWuXcO8

Contact Information:

Bradley Smith
Committee for Open Debate on the Holoacust
(Visit www.codoh.com for controversies on the Holocaust)
bradley1930@yahoo.com
PO Box 439016
San Ysidro, CA 92143
Telephone: 209 682 5327

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Copying Heinz Bartesch's letter to Peter Black, Senior Historian at USHMM

Peter Black, Senior Historian

US Holocaust Memorial Museum

Washington D.C.

E-mail: pblack@ushmm.org

Tel: 202.479.9728


Dear Professor Black:

Below you will find a letter by Heinz Bartesch, the son of Martin Bartesch, who you referred to in the talk you gave at Rhode Island College, as reported in the RIC Anchor of 27 March. Mr. Bartesch questions your facts and your moral assumptions as presented there.

This copy of Mr. Bartesch’s letter is for your information.

You may have missed it.

The Anchor, to its credit, posted it on its Webpage.

I will forward this to others at the USHMM and to the press.

Bradley Smith

========================================

Kathelin Hurd
News Editor news@anchorweb.org
The Anchor
Rhode Island College
Providence, Rhode Island

Your article would be considerably more truthful if it was entitled "Incorporating the Holocaust propaganda effectively into lesson plans" as I assure you this workshop, or anything promoted by US Holocaust Museum (USHMM) will be anything but true education as there will be only distorted facts presented and there won't be ANY opportunity for a student scholar to ask questions and present facts that dispute the presenters claims.


Let me explain by using a simple example from the 'facts' you site in the case of Martin Bartesch. I'm painfully familiar with the true facts as Martin was my father. First, let's begin with a little history lesson (which students assuredly won't get from the workshop); Martin was a 16 year old farm-boy living in Transylvania Romania when he was conscripted into the Waffen SS. I'll save you the details of what his life, and those of other ethnic Germans were like and how they were caught in a war they didn't ask for or want for brevity sake.

However, as a 16 year old inductee, he just happened to be stationed in Mauthausen for several weeks before he was shipped off to the Eastern front to fight the Russians. During this time, which was used as training for his anti-tank battalion, he was also stationed as a perimeter guard. He never set foot inside the camp and had no say in what was going on. All he knew was he had orders to shoot anyone trying to escape. And this is unfortunately what happened when he shot Max Ochsorn, who as interned as a money forger, a criminal who would be imprisoned by any government anywhere (another fact that I'm certain this 'workshop' won't bother to cover).

It should be noted (but it won't) that when my father shot the escaping prisoner, he had to fill a complete report and was immediately relieved of duty until it was investigated. Not quite the MO for a regime that was intent on mass genocide, don't you think? It should also be mentioned (but it won't be) that this is the exact same orders that US GI's were given at the Japanese internment (concentration) camps and that US GI's did indeed shoot and kill escaping prisoners (which isn't a war crime only because we won the war).

It should also be noted (but it won't) that even the Judges at the Nuremberg trials ruled that it was NOT a war crime for a perimeter guard to shoot an escaping prisoner.

Next, your comment, undoubtedly fed to you by the USHMM, that my father lied under oath to gain access to the US is blatantly a lie. Any reporter willing to do any real research would be able to reveal the real fact which is my father answered all the questions he was asked on the immigration form; he entered the fact he was in the Waffen SS, the Division he was in, and the dates. He was never asked to state all the places he had served, so saying he lied is nothing but propaganda (ie, a self serving lie to meet a political end).

It should also be noted (but it won't), that even serving at Mauthausen as a guard would not have been grounds for rejection into the US.

It should be noted (but it won't), that it only became a 'crime' with the signing and implementation of the Holtzman Ammendment which created the OSI. In effect, it's an ext post facto law - a law enacted which made something previously legal, illegal.

It should be noted (but it won't) that I won a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the OSI and then Director Neal Sher (who has since been disbarred for other reasons) that proved that the OSI had exculpatory evidence which they withheld from the court.

So, you see, when you say that "the workshop was designed to provide students with reference materials such as The State of Deception: The Power of Nazi Propaganda,-- You should say that the real "Power of Propaganda" now belongs to USHMM and that the real "Deception" is on the students.

And, lest you think I'm just a lone voice crying in the wilderness, a son who's angry at what happened to his father, I can assure you that there are countless cases of outright fraud and half truths. I pity the poor students who will be indoctrinated in this special kind of government approved propaganda, it's anything but real education - real education allows for cross examination and questioning of evidence, something our government and the USHMM could never, and will never allow.


Heinz (Bartesch)

"If my heart could do my thinking And my head begin to feel, I would look upon the world anew And know what's truly real." Van Morrison

REAL EYES REALIZE REAL LIES

Friday, April 6, 2012

Professor Faurisson forces the CRIF (French Jewish lobby) into a humiliating retreat

By Guillaume Fabien

April 2, 2012

The CRIF (Representative Council of Jewish Institutions in France) is the closest thing France has to the United States Jewish lobby's flagship organisation AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee). Early each year, for example, the CRIF summons – more than it invites – to a solemn ceremonial dinner most of the country's government, starting with the President of the Republic, the Prime Minister, the Presidents of both the National Assembly and the Senate, and up to fifteen serving Ministers or Secretaries of State, not to mention a plethora of lofty figures from domestic and foreign political, economic, diplomatic and media spheres. On this occasion, ritually, those attending do not fail to listen religiously to the speech made by the CRIF's President. In flattering, complaining and threatening tones he gives his lesson to France and dictates to the government the conduct to adopt in the near future so as better to heed the chosen people's desiderata. The gove rnment representatives who've taken in this lecture then vie in their obsequiousness, undertaking to do even better in the year just begun in bending to the edicts of this mighty body. For the CRIF the rights and privileges of the State of Israel are the priority of priorities. Its current president is Richard Prasquier, a round little man whose nerves often seem quite on edge

The bête noire of this president is historical revisionism and, therefore, Professor Robert Faurisson. In February 2012, Faurisson's visit to Iran and meeting with President Ahmadinejad, who bestowed on him the first ever "award for courage, resistance and fighting spirit" and received him in a special audience, made Richard Prasquier lose control of his nerves. He posted three articles dealing with Faurisson on his organisation's website, all three under the name of an individual called Marc Knobel ("Faurisson and Ahmadinejad, the infernal couple" on February 15; "Far-right and Iran, the great love affair" on February 22; "Robert Faurisson, portrait of a Holocaust denier, [book] by Valerie Igounet" on March 15). The pitch of these pieces steadily rose to the point where an emboldened Marc Knobel, who had begun by writing that Faurisson had "probably" received a cheque for €120,000 from President Ahmadinejad, ended up stating without reservation that the Professor had w ell and truly received a cheque for that amount. There, at a stroke, probability had disappeared altogether; there was now just confirmation, a calm certainty.

In France there is a law enabling any person named or designated in an article to exercise what is called "the right of reply", and those in charge of the publication in question will have, upon receipt of the "reply" text, a period of five working days in which to publish it. One must be aware that the drafting of such a text is a consummate art. The gist of Professor Faurisson's letter to the CRIF was in the following sentence:

The truth is as follows: neither before, during nor after my stay in Tehran did I receive, either from the Iranian president or any of his representatives, "a cheque for 120,000 euros" nor any other sum of money at all either by cheque, cash in hand or any other means.

Such wording adhered strictly to the requirements of legislation and case law. The CRIF was therefore obliged to publish the text, but decided not to do so.

Nonetheless news of the matter began to spread, notably with the publication, in Italy, of the brief paper the Professor had presented in Tehran ("Against Hollywoodism, Revisionism"). This occurred in the daily Rinascita on February 21. That very day, the Jewish community of Rome demanded nothing less than the banning of the newspaper! It did so in an article entitled "Faurisson oltraggia la Shoah" (Faurisson's outrage against the Shoah). In France, the CRIF website, in its press review of March 2, cited that article but – a noteworthy detail – without mentioning its demand for Rinascita's closure. Soon afterwards, realising that the Professor was preparing to take them to court, Richard Prasquier and friends saw they were caught in the trap of their "aggravated lie" and, as the criminal or civil code puts it, of their "refusal of the right of reply" and the "personal injury" or "defamation" that they had brought about.

Thus did the almighty CRIF suddenly find itself forced into the most humiliating of back-downs. On March 21 the site posted, with the by-line of its trusted liar, Marc Knobel, a formal retraction: no, the Professor had received no cheque, no money! ("Précision concernant un article sur Robert Faurisson" – Clarification concerning an article on Robert Faurisson).

The entertaining bit is that, when making his retraction, the liar found a way to slip in two "lies of omission" (of lesser calibre, it's true, than the original lie). Marc Knobel began by omitting the fact that after his article of February 15 he had, on February 22, reoffended, aggravating the charge made in his first piece. Then he left out the fact that the information prompting his back-down had come from a certain text whose existence he avoided mentioning at all: this was, precisely, the Professor's "right of reply" letter (see: "Mensonge, reculade, et nouveau mensonge du CRIF" – Lie, back-down, and new lie by the CRIF).

One may wonder whether this humiliation is the first of its kind ever endured by an institution which, drunk with power, believes itself to be above such a traditional and well-known French law as that of July 29, 1881 on "the freedom of the press".

As for Richard Prasquier, he incurs a heavy responsibility in all this business. For starters, by his refusal to grant Professor Faurisson a wholly justified "right of reply", he flouted the law. Then, to avoid the risk of a lawsuit, he turned to the liar Marc Knobel himself to have the lie corrected; the latter did that but, as we've seen, permitted himself two new lies in the process.

Even at the CRIF there must be honest people. Will they leave a President of the quality of Richard Prasquier in office for long?As for Marc Knobel, he seems to like staying in the shadows: thanks to the historian Paul-Eric Blanrue, here he is for once out in the daylight, in all his loveliness [omitted for technical reasons].

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Heinz Bartesch writes RIC Anchor about the Case of his Father, Martin Bartesch

Kathelin Hurd
News Editor news@anchorweb.org
The Anchor
Rhode Island College
Providence, Rhode Island

Your article would be considerably more truthful if it was entitled "Incorporating the Holocaust propaganda effectively into lesson plans" as I assure you this workshop, or anything promoted by US Holocaust Museum (USHMM) will be anything but true education as there will be only distorted facts presented and there won't be ANY opportunity for a student scholar to ask questions and present facts that dispute the presenters claims.


Let me explain by using a simple example from the 'facts' you site in the case of Martin Bartesch. I'm painfully familiar with the true facts as Martin was my father. First, let's begin with a little history lesson (which students assuredly won't get from the workshop); Martin was a 16 year old farm-boy living in Transylvania Romania when he was conscripted into the Waffen SS. I'll save you the details of what his life, and those of other ethnic Germans were like and how they were caught in a war they didn't ask for or want for brevity sake.


However, as a 16 year old inductee, he just happened to be stationed in Mauthausen for several weeks before he was shipped off to the Eastern front to fight the Russians. During this time, which was used as training for his anti-tank battalion, he was also stationed as a perimeter guard. He never set foot inside the camp and had no say in what was going on. All he knew was he had orders to shoot anyone trying to escape. And this is unfortunately what happened when he shot Max Ochsorn, who as interned as a money forger, a criminal who would be imprisoned by any government anywhere (another fact that I'm certain this 'workshop' won't bother to cover).


It should be noted (but it won't) that when my father shot the escaping prisoner, he had to fill a complete report and was immediately relieved of duty until it was investigated. Not quite the MO for a regime that was intent on mass genocide, don't you think? It should also be mentioned (but it won't be) that this is the exact same orders that US GI's were given at the Japanese internment (concentration) camps and that US GI's did indeed shoot and kill escaping prisoners (which isn't a war crime only because we won the war).


It should also be noted (but it won't) that even the Judges at the Nuremberg trials ruled that it was NOT a war crime for a perimeter guard to shoot an escaping prisoner.


Next, your comment, undoubtedly fed to you by the USHMM, that my father lied under oath to gain access to the US is blatantly a lie. Any reporter willing to do any real research would be able to reveal the real fact which is my father answered all the questions he was asked on the immigration form; he entered the fact he was in the Waffen SS, the Division he was in, and the dates. He was never asked to state all the places he had served, so saying he lied is nothing but propaganda (ie, a self serving lie to meet a political end).


It should also be noted (but it won't), that even serving at Mauthausen as a guard would not have been grounds for rejection into the US.


It should be noted (but it won't), that it only became a 'crime' with the signing and implementation of the Holtzman Ammendment which created the OSI. In effect, it's an ext post facto law - a law enacted which made something previously legal, illegal.


It should be noted (but it won't) that I won a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the OSI and then Director Neal Sher (who has since been disbarred for other reasons) that proved that the OSI had exculpatory evidence which they withheld from the court.


So, you see, when you say that "the workshop was designed to provide students with reference materials such as The State of Deception: The Power of Nazi Propaganda”, You should say that the real "Power of Propaganda" now belongs to USHMM and that the real "Deception" is on the students.


And, lest you think I'm just a lone voice crying in the wilderness, a son who's angry at what happened to his father, I can assure you that there are countless cases of outright fraud and half truths. I pity the poor students who will be indoctrinated in this special kind of government approved propaganda, it's anything but real education - real education allows for cross examination and questioning of evidence, something our government and the USHMM could never, and will never allow.

--
Heinz

"If my heart could do my thinking And my head begin to feel, I would look upon the world anew And know what's truly real." Van Morrison

REAL EYES REALIZE REAL LIES

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Reader Offers to Pay for CODOH Ads in RIC Anchor

George Bissell, Editor-in-Chief
The Anchor
Rhode Island College
Providence, Rhode Island
editorinchief@anchorweb.org

Dear Mr Bissell,

I would like to thank you and congratulate you for your moral courage and intellectual honesty in publishing the advertisement placed in The Anchor by Bradley Smith. The more so that you almost certainly are not personally in sympathy with the position taken by Inconvenient History. (Please do not respond to that: I do not wish or expect you to and your view is none of my business.)
It is very difficult for people in a position such as yours to go against what Norman Finkelstein has called The Holocaust Industry; they use the weapons of insult and vilification to suppress any questioning of their own position and any independent research that may come to alternative conclusions.
If you have a moment to spare please take a look at an article of Bradley Smith's The Irrational Vocabulary of the American Professorial Class with Regard to the Holocaust Question
Could you be kind enough to tell me the cost of this advert in The Anchor? I would like to pay for a few insertions myself.
With warmest regards
(Name withheld by Editor)

Saturday, March 24, 2012

EDITOR OF RIC ANCHOR STANDS UP F0R THE RIGHT TO A FREE PRESS

Hello Bradley,
I am responding to your complaint about the advertisement "Inconvenient History: The Power of Taboo," that ran in the last issue of The Anchor that came out on March 10. We have not had an issue come out since then because of Spring Break and our conference so no issues have passed since the advertisement last ran. Our ads manager made a mistake deciding to "pull the ad". He took this action without my knowledge and without my approval. The advertisement will run in The Anchor as long as you are willing to pay for it. We are a forum for free expression and the exchange of ideas, meaning that we will not censor any of our content. Our ads manager made a mistake and has been re-assigned. The Anchor would be willing to run the ad again as long as your organization is willing to pay for it.
I hope this clears everything up and I thank you for bringing this situation to my attention. I was not aware that this action had been taken by my ads manager.
If you have any questions, let me know.
--
George Bissell
Editor-in-Chief
The Anchor Newspaper
Rhode Island College's Student Newspaper
(401)-456-8790 (office)

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

THE ISSUE OF FREE INQUIRY AT RHODE ISLAND COLLEGE

George Bissell, Editor-in-Chief
The Anchor
Rhode Island College
Providence, Rhode Island
editorinchief@anchorweb.org

21 March 2012

Mr. Bissel:

Earlier this month we submitted a print ad to run in The Anchor that read: "Inconvenient History: The Power of Taboo," along with a URL that leads to the Website of Inconvenient History: A Quarterly Journal for Free Historical Inquiry. The ad appeared one time in The Anchor, but was then suppressed because of a "reaction" from a professor or someone representing a special interest on your campus. We have no other information.

The Spring 2012 issue of Inconvenient History includes:

Editorial: Bookburning in the Style of 2011
Resistance Is Obligation
Ritual Defamation: A Contemporary Academic Example
Stephen F. Pinter, An Early Revisionist
A Postcard from Treblinka
Review: The Wandering Who
The Palestinians as an "Invented People"
Relegation--A Formula for Blowback

What special interest at RIC would be invested in suppressing access to such information by RIC students? Perhaps you should ask those who are presenting the Belfer First Step Workshop on the Holocaust at RIC this week. It is certain that The Workshop will represent the demonstrably problematic perspective on the history of that fragment of World War ll referred to as "Holocaust." It is a given that nothing presented at such an event can be questioned publicly.

Should it not be different with The Anchor? Is it not the ideal of journalism, of a free press, to allow and even to encourage a free exchange of ideas? You may not think so.

Still, I understand you are in a difficult situation. You would have to stand alone against the entire faculty and administration of Rhode Island College if you were to try to allow an ad from Inconvenient History to run in The Anchor.

Sincerely,

Bradley Smith

PS: If I am informed I am wrong about any of the above I will acknowledge my error publicly.

I can be reached at bradley1930@yahoo.com

or

PO Box 439016
San Ysidro, CA 92143
Telephone: 209 682 5327


[ This letter has been copied to students and faculty at RIC.]

Friday, March 16, 2012

THE ISSUE OF FREE INQUIRY AT U NORTHERN COLORADO

Benjamin Welch, Editor-in-Chief -
The UNC Mirror
University of Northern Colorado

Dear Mr. Welch:

I would like you to know that we very much appreciate the fact that the UNC Mirror has agreed to run our announcement for "Inconvenient History: The Power of Taboo." Clicking on the link your readers are taken to the Website of "Inconvenient History: A Quarterly Journal for Free Historical Inquiry."

The Spring 2012 issue includes:

Editorial: Bookburning in the Style of 2011
Resistance Is Obligation
Ritual Defamation: A Contemporary Academic Example
Stephen F. Pinter An Early Revisionist
A Postcard from Treblinka
Review: The Wandering Who
The Palestinians as an "Invented People"
Relegation A Formula for Blowback

We advocate a free exchange of ideas about a series of historical questions that are taboo with the American professoriate across the nation. Example: I doubt that there is one academic at U Northern Colorado who openly supports a free exchange of ideas with regard to Holocaust orthodoxy. Or one academic who will encourage, or even allow, such a free exchange of ideas to take place on this matter in his/her classroom,

All this being so, I understand that you are in a difficult situation. Still, we encourage the UNC Mirror to continue to support the right to free inquiry against the opposition of UNC academics and administration. And, I should add, the opposition of a number of special-interest organizations on and off-campus that you may hear from.

Sincerely,

Bradley Smith

PS: I understand I might be wrong about any particular of the above. If I am, please tell me where and I will acknowledge my error publicly.

Do you want to talk about it?
You can reach me at bradley1930@yahoo.com

This letter has been copied to students and faculty at UNC.

Thursday, March 15, 2012

Smith's Report# 190

Dear Friend / Supporter: in this issue

of Smith's Report# 190 you will find:


Against Hollywoodism, Revisionism

By Robert Faurisson


Hollywood, the Holocaust, and the Hatred of Truth

By Jett Rucker


FRAGMENTS: Another Ordinary Life

By Bradley R. Smith


Bookburning in the Style of 2011

By Richard A. Widmann


To the Abattoir:

Investigating the Legionary Rebellion of January 21-23, 1941

By Charles Krafft


Read Smith's Report


Your Contribution helps with this work


There's no one else

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

"Self-Hating" Historiographer Dead at 77

Peter Novick, a (non-practicing) Jewish professor at the University of Chicago, wrote the ground-breaking (and earth-shaking) The Holocaust in American Life in 1999. With insight massively confirmed in the 13 years since its publication, Novick delineated how that group of events, imagined and real, now packaged under the rubric of "the Holocaust" acquired outsize influence in American discourse among both Jews and non-Jews alike.

He explored some of the reasons for this development, identifying the promotion of Israeli aggression as but one of the nefarious undertakings buttressed by the worship and enforcement of Holocaust mythology.

The New York Times's Dennis Hevesi (brother of Holocaust abuser Alan Hevesi) does an impressive job of reviewing this savant's contributions in this article, whose many links do not include any to the book, or a site on which one might purchase the book.

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Codoh is running an ad in The Mirror Newspaper at the University of Northern Colorado


The online edition of The Mirror at the University of Northern Colorado is running our rotating ad that appears all over their site. The ad reads: "INCONVENIENT HISTORY: The Power of Taboo ". When the reader clicks on the ad she is taken to the Homepage of Inconvenient History, and through that page to everything on CODOHWeb

Saturday, February 25, 2012

A Parallel Holocaust

While the National Socialists were carrying out their racial programs in the parts of Europe they conquered, the other country that lost World War II, Japan, was conquering and occupying parts of Asia, mostly China. There, as in Europe, "war crimes" were committed upon the people in occupied countries that emerged victorious at the end of the conflict, and the victors rounded up, charged, "tried," and executed a considerable number of "war criminals," some of whom may have indeed have been guilty of genuine atrocities.

But this story in the New York Times points up one area in which the after-action stories diverge: at least since the departure of the counter-occupiers of Japan, it apparently is not a crime in Japan to dispute accounts of war crimes advanced by the victors, as it is in Germany and many other countries in Europe, including victorious ones.

The rationale of the thought-crime laws in Europe is that failure to criminalize such discussion might lead to a recurrence of National Socialism or some other unpleasant political development. It appears, however, that the comparative freedom enjoyed by the Japanese to discuss all World War II history has somehow not led to such developments. Indeed, a casual comparison of Japan with Europe leaves Europe seeming the leader in troubling developments of "nationalism" that remind some of National Socialism.

Maybe the Japanese are more to be trusted in such matters. Or maybe Jews were not represented among their victims.

A True Sportsman and the Holocaust

A leading player for the ice hockey team of Düsseldorf comes from America and has gained (and accepted) German citizenship on the basis of his being a Jew descended from German Jews who are veterans of the Holocaust.
The story of Evan Kaufmann of Minnesota, his American parents and his German Jewish (paternal) grandparents who were caught up by the National Socialists' ethnic-cleansing program during World War II is an inspiring story of reconciliation and forgiveness on the part of three generations of a remarkable family (not to mention that of his American Jewish wife, who has accompanied him to Germany).
That the Kaufmanns apparently are forgiving considerably graver atrocities than actually happened renders the entire story that much more inspiring. The grandparents, now long deceased, may of course have known more than they chose to tell, at least publicly, and in any case, more than the New York Times is about to disclose in its Zionist pages.

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Getting the message out

Each month the work of getting the revisionist message out is a little different. This month we are focusing on sending the following text and links to some 27,000 students associated with student organizations at university campuses across the nation. These links lead to autobiographical stories that present the life of one Holocaust revisionist from a perspective the student will never find in his Holocaust Studies programs. I believe it will cause any number of students to reevaluate the standard professorial slander used to characterize the “character” of those of us who doubt what the student is taught to believe.

The cost for developing these lists, one email at a time, is about $10 per hundred. As of now that works out to about $2,700. I would like to build a list of 100,000 students associated with student organizations at campuses around the country. It costs money to get the message out. But that’s our work. If you can help it will make all the difference.

Below is the full text of the send that is going out now to student organizations nation-wide.

===========================

A PERSONAL HISTORY OF MORAL DECAY

By Bradley Smith

NOTE: Campus newspapers at universities around the country are refusing to publish advertisements for the stories linked to below. That is their right. But what is the problem, specifically? The stories take place from the 1950s in South-Central Los Angeles, Korea, and Mexico through the 60s and 70s in Hollywood and Vietnam. And from there on through Iran to today in Baja.

Campuses at which the student newspaper has refused to allow their readers access to these stories include UCLA, Harvard, U Wisconsin-Madison, UC San Diego, USC, UC Santa Barbara, U South Florida, UC Irvine, Cal State Fullerton, Youngstown State, San Diego State, U Miami, American U and Columbia. That is--it’s a nation-wide phenomenon.

Why do you think the campus press does not want its readers to even know that these stories exist? And why do faculty at these universities invariably (invariably!) support the ban against students being informed that these simple stories exist? Do you believe such bans carried out nation-wide respect the ideals of a free press or of the university itself?

Do you want to talk about it?

Reach me at bradley1930@yahoo.com

Or

Bradley Smith

CODOH

PO Box 439016

San Ysidro, CA 92143

==================================================


1950s (SOUTH CENTRAL LOS ANGELES ) "The Daring Young Man Meets William Saroyan"
http://codohfounder.com/the-daring-young-man-meets-william-saroyan


1950s (MEXICO) "Laughing at the Dead. Not laughing"
http://codohfounder.com/laughing-at-the-dead-not-laughing


1960s (HOLLYWOOD) "Saved By The Animals"
http://codohfounder.com/saved-by-the-animals


1960s (VIETNAM) "Che Guevara in Saigon"
http://codohfounder.com/che-guevara-in-saigon


1970s (HOLLYWOOD) "Libertarians, Aliens, and Mal-contents"
http://codohfounder.com/libertarians-aliens-and-mal-contents

END

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Not Enough Revisionists in Jail - Or Executed

Jewish judges and lawyers gathered, as announced in Smith's Report, in Berlin last November and cooked up more new ways to use the law to control discussion of the Holocaust on the Internet in countries all over the world. They've come up with this resolution lamenting, among other things, the fact that so few revisionists have been convicted of crimes in the countries in which such activities are a crime (no doubt they mean to increase the number of such countries, as they applaud Germany's membership in that shameful group). Presumably, they also lament that those convicted are only incarcerated for a few years (e.g., Germar Rudolf, Ernst Zündel) instead of being locked up for life or, better yet, exterminated altogether.

The attendees have returned to their respective jurisdictions, and are no doubt diligently working to suppress the freedom of speech practiced on the Internet that has so discomfited them in so many ways.

Friday, January 27, 2012

Inter-National Historical Disputes, and Trade

Jean would like to buy a lot of refrigerators from Mehmet (who makes good refrigerators cheaply in Turkey) for his (Jean's) customers in France.

But he can't. Or if he can, he has to pay more for them than if . . . their respective countries' governments weren't feuding over a historical matter (the killing of Armenians by Turks a hundred years ago). The French government just passed a law making it a crime to say that "it" wasn't "genocide."

So the Turkish government (or the French, or both) interfere with Jean and Mehmet's conspiracy to provide better refrigerators to French consumers while providing gainful employment to Turkish workers.

So it goes.

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Jewish Lightning - with Swastikas!

The arson of over-insured buildings - and cars - has somehow over the years acquired the prejudicial sobriquet "Jewish lightning," a reference apparently not so much to the arsonists as to the owners of the torched assets who stand to collect from the insurance company.

The burning last November of a Jaguar in a Jewish neighborhood of Brooklyn was heavily marked as a hate crime, not only from the beer bottles littering the area (haters like beer) but from the spray-painting of swastikas and "KKK" on nearby objects and, just to be thorough, the torching of the BMW and the Lexus parked next to the target vehicle. The ADL has offered a $4,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of the perpetrators of this arson, though their offer may have disappeared by the time you try to follow this link to it.

A report in a neighborhood Brooklyn newspaper now reveals that in this case, the arsonists themselves may be Jewish, though it leaves the ethnicity of the owners of the cars to inference from the heavy majority of those living and parking their cars in the area. Investigators have turned up evidence that the Jag was burned for the insurance money, with the BMW, the Lexus, and the overworked legacy of the Holocaust thrown in to make it look like anti-Semitism.

Do not expect major news outlets such as those that carried the original "hate crime" story to carry follow-up stories. Doing so might be seen as anti-Semitic.