Saturday, May 26, 2012

For Vincent Reynouard

From Robert Faurrison

I sincerely hope that the recent appeal by Vincent Reynouard with, at his side, Marie Bruchet, will be heard by all our friends.

At the strictly scientific and historical level revisionism has won the match but, on the other hand, at the educational, propaganda and media level we are more and more besieged. To the general public we increasingly risk appearing as losers. The flood of falsely scientific publications by our opponents swells relentlessly; now more than ever it must be stemmed with responses of real scientific and technical character. In France the Florent Brayards, Edouard Hussons, Patrick Desbois and partners come out with stacks of the most hefty, hollow and dishonest books. They need to be answered. We would be fooling ourselves if we thought it would do to keep quiet in the face of them, or refer people to revisionist studies published in the past.

At a trial five years ago barrister Charrière-Bournazel, then head of the Paris bar association and representing the “anti-racist” organisation LICRA against me, had the court itself remark his surprise at my “energy”. “Where does he get all that energy?”, he cried, adding, with the delicacy for which he is known: “The biological solution doesn’t seem to be in view!”.

Today the biological solution has come closer. My lifestyle – like, for that matter, Vincent Reynouard’s and that of other revisionists – is, so to speak, ... overwork.

At 83 such a lifestyle becomes deadly. In the face of this fatal outlook I used to console myself, until just lately, in thinking that the job would be carried on in France by Vincent Reynouard, assisted by a vigorous young woman (as I was able to see at the recent conference in Tehran where, knowing her subject thoroughly, she was not intimidated in the least by the opposing side). But now I learn the dismal news: Vincent and Marie might be forced to jump the revisionist galley!

There can be no question of it. Vincent Reynouard is exceptionally gifted for scientific research and, above all, he has no equal in the skill of explaining things. He owes this rare talent to his qualities of the heart: he knows how to listen, to put himself in the position of others and, with forbearance, to bring those unable or unwilling to understand back onto the path of comprehension and intelligence. His dedication to the revisionist cause is total and he has already paid dearly for his heroism.

It would be absurd and disgraceful if, having a man of this calibre in our ranks, we let go of him just when the desperate offensive of an opponent at bay threatened to swamp us.

There is of course more than one dwelling in the revisionist house and I know that, in his turn, a man of singular energy is about to enter fully upon the scene to come to our aid, but I shall say what I think: “Vincent Reynouard is irreplaceable”. You were probably already aware, but it seemed to me, at this defining moment for the future of revisionism, that I ought to remind you, even if with “the remnants of a dwindling voice and an ardour that is fading”.

I beseech you: give him your help, unstintingly. Do so for him, for me, for the noble cause of historical revisionism. Thank you.

March 31, 2012


Note: For information on subscriptions to Vincent Reynouard’s publication Sans Concession or on membership of the Cercle d’amis de la famille Reynouard, please contact or

Mr Reynouard’s website, “Pour une Histoire Débarrassée des Nombreux Mensonges » (For a History rid of numerous lies), is at

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Yes, AGAIN! And HERE! And SOON, Perhaps!

The US Army hasn't conducted a concentration operation on US soil since 1942 (when it rounded up and incarcerated Japanese Americans), but the Army has recently put out a detailed manual for its operatives to follow when doing so again - on short notice, it would seem.

Just supposing the technique could have some validity when and as carried out by the US Army, why must the equivalent technique carried out by German forces in times of dire conflict (chiefly after the war with the Soviet Union started) be a crime against humanity? Because Jews were prominent among the explicitly targeted subjects of the action?

All I can say is, Army, whomever you round up in this process in the future, do not round up any Jews. If you do somehow round any up, immediately let them go with apologies and lavish reparations (to continue for as long as they live).

Or is that already in the manual?

The Science of Hoaxography

A professor at George Mason University is making waves with a "laboratory" course he has been teaching for a few years now in how historical mythology is created, with emphasis, of course, on present-day media and environments such as the Internet.

This article in The Atlantic describes the course and its import very well. But the account, as well as apparently the course itself, somehow avoids that Hoax of the Twentieth Century that Arthur Butz indelibly named with the title of his landmark 1976 book.

It's clear that, in order to retain his academic post and standing, Professor Kelly must continue to avoid the biggest elephant in his room assiduously. But at a minimum, those of his students who pay even passing attention to his lessons will be unable to miss seeing where they most need to be applied.

Thursday, May 10, 2012

Their Names, Faces - and Voices!

The International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists has put up 14 videos on their Web site to convey the talks given at their conference "Holocaust Denial and Freedom of Speech in the Internet Era" in Berlin last November. Most of the talks are aimed at suppressing both of the first-named items.

While only two of the talks are by native speakers of English, the others acquit themselves very well with English as their second language, aided by the excellent recording quality that befits an organization as well funded as the IAJLJ and the other organizations pursuing the same agenda.

You can listen, and watch, as they tell each other how to go about their nefarious conspiracy. The videos are all carried on YouTube, use of which they seek to deny to revisionists. You can enter comments there.

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Bad Link on Smith's Report 191 ( May issue)

The article “Sensation in France: Professor Faurisson Forces the CRIF (Jewish Lobby) into a Humiliating Retreat” contains several links, one of which does not lead to the intended Web page.

On Page 9, the link was supposed to lead to CRIF’s public retraction of the falsehoods they had previously published about Robert Faurisson. Instead, it leads to CRIF’s home page.

 The corrected link, reading , leads to the intended Web page.

 The page is, like the previous articles to which the retraction relates, in French only.