Monday, July 29, 2013

New at Elie Wiesel Cons The World: Adventures in Buchenland

Elie’s Adventures in Buchenland

By Carolyn Yeager



“How puzzling all these changes are! I’m never sure what I’m going to be, from one minute to another.”
― Lewis Carroll, Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland

Introduction: In Elie Wiesel’s book Night, we find the scenario and characters changing often, and in many cases, with little rhyme or reason that is apparent to the reader. One easily concludes that, like Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, it is a work of absurdity.

In Lewis Carroll’s classic, nothing makes sense because nothing has to make sense – the intention was to be a “childish” type of foolishness or make-believe from the start. It is an example of literary nonsense (1) genre. Interestingly, we find similar examples of nonsense and absurdity in many of the stories and writings of self-proclaimed “holocaust survivors” – and we put Elie Wiesel into this category. This is why Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland is such a good fit for a parody of Elie Wiesel’s Night.

Cast of Characters:

Elie = Elie Wiesel
White Rabbit = Ken Waltzer
Father = no such person has been found
The King and Queen of Hearts = SS-Totenkopfverbände (SS-TV)
The Duchess = Hilda Wiesel
The Cheshire Cat =Carolyn Yeager
The March Hare = Antonin Kalina, Czech communist block leader
The (Mad) Hatter = Gustav Schiller, Polish Jew block leader
~~~~
Elie is quite bored one warm afternoon at the Jewish orphan’s mansion in France where he lives. This is not unusual for Elie, who has absolutely nothing to do all day but play chess or study the Talmud and other holy texts of which he is known to be almost fanatically fond.  Today, though, no one was around the chess table that had been set up outdoors under a large tree, and Elie becomes a bit dreamy, maybe even sleepy. His is suddenly brought wide-awake again when he sees a White Rabbit run by, looking at his pocket watch and muttering “Oh dear, oh dear, I’m going to be late!”

Wednesday, July 24, 2013

The Jerusalem branch of the Simon Wiesenthal Center plans to unveil posters in three German cities to trace the last surviving Nazi death camp guards

NOTE: The current spectacle of a man-hunt for war veterans in their nineties for alleged crimes against humanity (i.e. crimes against Jews), never established but only vaguely outlined by hearsay (see the Demjanjuk case), highlights the disappearance of our value of justice, sucked into the black hole of "the Holocaust", and on into oblivion. A practice unimaginable a mere generation ago is fully accepted today thanks to general re-education, permitted without the least resistance on the part of those in responsible positions.

Such persons, instead of allowing an honest discussion of what happened to Europe's Jews during that now distant war before letting the now omnipresent Holocaustic perversion of society take root, without fail put respect for a noxious taboo above all else and so have left Talmudic law free to rule, in their own countries and in others. An abominable dereliction of duty! Thus former camp guards, members of "a criminal organization" (as the SS was defined by criminals calling themselves "the Allies"), have to be tracked down to the ends of the Earth till the end of time. Thus Captain Erich Priebke will turn 100 on July 29) in home imprisonment in Rome, although in 1996 Italian justice, ruling in a new trial for the German anti-terrorism reprisals carried out in the Ardeatine caves in 1944, ordered his release.

Respect for a soldier's duty to obey his superiors? Not for the goyim, not even in wartime! Not when Wiesenthal & Co. do not approve. Statute of limitations? Not for the goyim, not any longer. Incidentally, how many former Israeli soldiers have been troubled by the courts for their past killings of unarmed Arabs?

People who do nothing, who look on with indifference in the face of this barbarity have no right to complain about society's degeneration, about our ongoing backward evolution under Holocaustic authority.

Poster search for last Nazi guards in Germany

http://tinyurl.com/mwlbmem

The Jerusalem branch of the Simon Wiesenthal Center plans to unveil posters in three German cities to trace the last surviving Nazi death camp guards. Rewards are to be offered for leads from the public.

The Jerusalem-based director of the Nazi-hunting Simon Wiesenthal Center, Efraim Zuroff, told the German newspaper WAZ on Saturday that he believed that about 60 former Nazi death camp guards were still alive, "the majority in Germany."
The Westdeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung (WAZ), published in the Ruhr District city of Essen, quoted Zuroff as saying 6,000 guards worked 70 years ago at camps where Hitler's regime murdered six million Jews across Europe.

The posters, carrying the words "late, but not too late", will be displayed in Berlin, Hamburg and Cologne and show in black and white the rail entrance to the notorious Birkenau camp, near Auschwitz, in formerly occupied Poland.

Rewards worth up to 25,000 euros ($32,800) would be offered to informants.

Zuhoff told the news agency Reuters that the center had been encouraged by the arrest in Germany in May of Hans Lipschis, a 93-year-old suspected former Auschwitz guard.

Another boost was the war crimes case brought recently against 98-year-old former Nazi-era police officer Laszlo Csatary in his native Hungary.
Csatary, who fled to Canada after the war, ran a transit camp, from where 12,000 Jews were sent to their deaths, in Kosice in present-day Slovakia.

Demjanjuk case set new criteria


Impetus for new investigations in Germany came in 2011 when a Munich court convicted the Ukrainian-born former Sobibor death camp guard John Demjanjuk. He died in March last year, aged 91.       DW.DE

Posted by “N”

New Film tries to wash away the myth that Germans made soap out of Jews. Why?

An Israeli film maker who is admittedly "obsessed" with the Holocaust is finally putting to rest the urban myth that the Germans used the remains of Jewish bodies to create bars of soap.

“Soaps,” a new film by director Eyal Ballas, 43, finds that the soap myth originated in World War I, when Germans were rumored to be turning bodies into a cleaning product. Of course, Ballas blames the Germans for reviving the ugly story, claiming that "SS guards would harass concentration camp members by threatening to kill them and turn them into soap."

In fact, The Crazy Soap Myth was promoted at the Nuremberg Trials. L. N. Smirnov, Chief Counselor of Justice for the USSR, declared to the Tribunal:

"... The same base, rationalized SS technical minds which created gas chambers and murder vans, began devising such methods of complete annihilation of human bodies, which would not only conceal the traces of their crimes, but also to serve in the manufacturing of certain products. In the Danzig Anatomical Institute, semi-industrial experiments in the production of soap from human bodies and the tanning of human skin for industrial purposes were carried out."


The focus of the tale was the Dazing Anatomical Institute. The Institute was the major source of skeletons for universities and schools. It appears that 100 to 200 bodies were used for that purpose yearly. Bodies were de-fleshed in large vats. Soviet investigators took the fatty mixture of human material left in the vats and presented it to the Tribunal as "soap.”



A picture of the gray disgusting material referred to as “soap.” (See exhibit USSR-393). It is totally unsuitable for cleaning anything. In fact, it would be a source of contamination wherever and upon whatever it was used.

The Soviets also claimed to have found a "human soap recipe" pinned to the wall of a German office. The True-Believer Nizkor (We will remember!) Web site, with one of the most remarkably crazy tales of the Holocaust story, quotes from a movie allegedly presented at Nuremberg.

"That day the blinding artificial lights were turned off in the courtroom, plunging it almost into darkness. In the wavering dim light the witness box was occupied by corpses…. The art of the courageous Soviet documentary film makers (some of whom are no longer alive) resurrected these corpses and brought them into the courtroom. It was as if they had risen from the grave and were hurling indisputable evidence in the defendant's faces. .. “  http://tinyurl.com/mpt9frh

Ya think?


Friday, July 19, 2013

USHMM Does Revisionism - VERY Cautiously

It seems that some revisionists are able to get the USHMM to revise their story - or, in this case, to defrock a former saint of theirs. This New York Times article reports USHMM's and other Holocaust shrines' actions in the evolving case of "Italy's Schindler," Giovanni Palatucci, heretofore enshrined for his wartime efforts in saving Jews in the Italian entrepot of Fiume.

The words at the very end of the article of Natalia Idrimi, director of the Primo Levi Center, on this occasion are truly haunting:
What matters is that this data can no longer be ignored.
One wonders just how far they and the rest of the Holocaust lobby might eventually be moved to go with such a sentiment ...

Monday, July 8, 2013

Police State: MY, How You've Grown

Yesterday's op ed by Daniel Ellsberg (of 1971 Pentagon Papers fame) provided a stunning retrospective on what Ellsberg calls the "different America" that dealt with him 40 years ago vis-a-vis the America that NSA Leaker Edward Snowden faces today for having committed "crimes" very similar to those committed by Ellsberg. The effect of the comparison on me, already adult by 1971, was stunning. Those not yet of age by that time face a greater challenge in being so stunned, but I strongly recommend the out-of-body effort to every such person concerned with our shrinking latitude to express our views.

There is one sad corrective that must be made to the impression created by Ellsberg's invaluable article: the erosions of freedom of speech are in no way limited to America: they are world-wide. One needs only to consider that in 1971, none of the laws criminalizing Holocaust revisionism now defiling the societies of France, Switzerland, Belgium, Austria and Germany were in existence, other than the German laws punishing glorification of the National Socialist government of 1933-1945, which is still in effect.

Come to think of it, the Swiss Jürgen Graf, persecuted in his home country for "Holocaust denial," has had to exile himself to Russia, the very country in which Edward Snowden was holed up at last report. Russia, land of the free?

Friday, July 5, 2013

An Open Letter to the President of Georgetown University re The Jan Karski Institute


President John J. DeGioia

Office of the President

Georgetown University
204 Healy Hall
37th & "O" Streets, NW
Washington, DC 20057-1789
Fax: (202) 687-6660

Chief of Staff: Joseph A. Ferrara jaf@georgetown.edu

05 July 2013

Dear President DeGioia:

It has occurred to me to wonder if you are unaware of at least some of the compromising realities underlying the Georgetown University’s Jan Karski Institute. If you are, the following missive might serve as an introduction to the matter for you and those in your office. I believe we would all agree that ideally the university is about things other than fundraising, no matter what guise it comes in.

By July 1943 then, America had been shipping its treasure and treasured youth away to death and destruction toward both east and west for over a year and a half in torrents never before witnessed in the annals of war. At that moment, Jan Karski first set foot on our beleaguered shores with a message dire with horror and hurry: those Nazis are killing Europe’s Jews by the millions using methods so calculatedly cruel as to be unbelievable! America must immediately redouble its already Herculean efforts to drive the Germans out of the countries they had conquered (Karski’s own first among them).

In fact, when he buttonholed leading Jewish American Felix Frankfurter with his tales of mass torture and slaughter, the famous jurist, a long-time witness from his bench to impassioned pleas of every stripe imaginable, concluded “I do not believe you.” And in this case, as in so many other cases in judgment of which he sat, he was correct: the witness, in his deceitful campaign to pour oil on the fire already then consuming America’s lifeblood, was exaggerating well past the point of perjury.

In the name of this adjudged false witness, now, Georgetown University’s Jan Karski Institute for Holocaust Education proudly reprises his beating of the war drums with a talk by acquitted libeler Deborah Lipstadt titled “The Eichmann Trial,” after the 1961 show trial in Israel attendant to the illegal kidnapping of Adolf Eichmann from Argentina and his subsequent hanging at the hands of his abductors. It promises to be a celebration of the bloody vengeance wreaked on Germans and Germany for lo, these 68 years so far, with no end to the gore-worshipping festivities yet in sight.

This educational institute named after an outside agitator who during his histrionic career switched between anti-Communist and anti-anti-Semite as the winds of fortune happened to dictate throughout its five decades, served, like Elie Wiesel at Boston University, as a money magnet for Georgetown University during his tenured life, and continues after death to serve this function while at the same time perpetuating the calumny that has dogged the German people ever since the jaws of the Soviet-American vise closed on their country in 1945. Featured Speaker Deborah Lipstadt bears her own crushing burdens of mendacity and avarice as she mounts the podium of defamation this month at the Catholic institution of higher learning in our nation’s capitol.

Would that somehow, the Mossad of some young, faraway theocracy might capture her before then, bundle her off in the night to its waiting aircraft at a secret airstrip, from there to fly her to its homeland, and there to “try” her, before the media of the world, for her own crimes of deceit, defamation and incitement, and as well the manifold crimes committed by her comrades-in-arms, starting with the Courier of Hate, Jan Kozielewski, today feted under his alias, Jan Karski.


Bradley Smith
Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust

Thursday, July 4, 2013

Letter to USHMM re Rosenberg Diary

United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
100 Raoul Wallenberg Place, SW
Washington, DC 20024-2126

03 July 2013

Attention: Senior Advisor on Archives, Henry Mayer

Dear Senior Advisor Mayer-

I am writing with regard to documents that were taken from the Nuremberg International War Crimes Tribunal by the American Prosecutor Robert Kempner. It has been reported that the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum "senior archivist," Henry Mayer, believes these writings could be the most revealing Nazi documents ever found.

Since Robert Kempner is suspected of the spoliation of evidence favorable to the Nuremberg defendants, since the documents have been reported as having been illegally taken by a Mr. Herbert Warren Richardson, and since earlier press releases describe the "diary as various pages, some not in Mr. Rosenberg's handwriting. Most entries are written in Rosenberg’s looping cursive, some on paper torn from a ledger book and others on the back of official Nazi stationary." Many people will be confused as to what papers were recovered by the government, what documents might not have been recovered, and what the relationship is between the various pages.

It is also being reported that "Mayer explained to this reporter that he was not given enough time to read any diary entry from beginning to end, but that he peeked into them and "arranged" them. He is convinced that scholars will find them "very important" and that the papers will open new avenues of research. He suggested that the documents will offer revelations. But, Mayer noted to the press, it may take a long time, possibly years, for scholars to complete their analyses of the diaries."

Given the years of manipulation, dishonesty, and secrecy surrounding these important papers, I respectfully suggest that we do not need you to "arrange" them before all else. What would be most open and honest would be for you to scan and post all the pages you have obtained so that all who are interested can read them. The documents will speak for themselves. We do not need you to control the documents and to keep them secret while "scholars complete their analysis."

Weeks have already passed since possession of the documents was gained. Press conferences have been held. Why do you not simply scan and post the documents publicly so that everyone who is interested in the matter can view and analyze them for themselves? Once that is completed, the papers can then be returned to the Rosenberg family, who appear to be the legal owners.

For Open discussion,

Bradley Smith
Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust

NOTE: This letter was copied to 16 offices of the USHMM around the country.

Wednesday, July 3, 2013

Filched Rosenberg Diaries Recovered

Filched Rosenberg Diaries Recovered


The U.S. Government has announced the recovery of 400 pages from the long-lost diary of Alfred Rosenberg, a Reich minister who was convicted at Nuremberg and hanged in 1946. The announcement was accompanied by a cryptic statement prepared by the US Holocaust Memorial Museum.

"A cursory content analysis indicates that the material sheds new light on a number of important issues relating to the Third Reich's policy. The diary will be an important source of information to historians that compliments, and in part contradicts, already known documentation."

How the writings of Rosenberg might contradict already known documentation is unclear. Further details about the diary's contents could not be learned, and a U.S. government official stressed that the museum's analysis remains preliminary.

The Diaries had been held by the Nuremberg prosecution team. It now appears that they were swiped by US prosecutor Robert Kempner. Ironically, Rosenberg was charged with stealing cultural artifacts. There is also no mention of returning Mr. Rosenberg's papers to his family

David Irving blew the whistle on Kempner years ago.  "Well it was pretty clear (and he did not deny) that he had stolen the entire diary of Alfred Rosenberg from the Nuremberg archives and was retaining it as his private property. The Rosenberg Diaries are a fund of true information on Hitler and the Holocaust; they are of enormous importance -- but where are they now? We await an early answer from the Holocaust Memorial Museum."  http://www.fpp.co.uk/History/General/Kempner1.html 

American prosecutor Robert Kempner
about the time he stole the documents. 1946
Kempner died in 1993 at age 93 and legal disputes about "his" papers raged for nearly a decade between his children, his former secretary, a local debris removal contractor and the Holocaust museum. Why a debris removal contractor was involved was not explained. http://forward.com/articles/178332/us-government-uncovers-long-lost-diary-of-top-nazi/?p=all#ixzz2W1gm4Q00

The Diaries consist of various papers written on the back of official stationary and on paper torn from a ledger book. The announcement also read, "Most entries are written in Rosenberg's looping cursive...,.No mention of who might have made additional entries and what they said was given.  How the various pages are connected chronologically was not revealed. It was not disclosed if there are any missing pages.

Why Kempner stashed Rosenberg's papers away for years was not disclosed either, but Kempner is credited as the "discoverer" of the draft memo presented at Nuremberg as the Wannsee Protocol.  More information may be announced this week at a news conference held jointly by officials from the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Justice and Holocaust museum.

 Kempner was almost certainly responsible for the attempt to conceal the Schlegelberger document from posterity the March 1942 Schlegelberger Document, in which a hard-pressed Adolf Hitler ordered the postponement of the Final Solution of the Jewish Problem until after the war. (The document was missing from the five-item folder of photocopies, ND: 4025-PS, after he returned it to the Nuremberg Trial archives; fortunately the original folder was found intact thirty years later in the Federal Archives). Since Mr. Irving first published the document in Hitler's War, 1977, conformist historians have had a hard time explaining it away."